Re: feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer?

From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen (hps@intermeta.de)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 04:28:33 EST

"David S. Miller" <davem@rth.ninka.net> writes:

>I really hope you have competant legal advice for the things you are
>doing, because binary-only derivative works of a GPL work are illegal.

No. Distributing work based on GPL code binary-only without supplying
the source and the modifications is (might be? is considered?)
illegal. This is a major difference.

Else I'd have to delete some of the kernels running here, because I
lost the sources for these. :-) (They're still running happily).

        Regards
                Henning 

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen       -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH     hps@intermeta.de

Am Schwabachgrund 22  Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0   info@intermeta.de
D-91054 Buckenhof     Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20   
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:22 EST