Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses

From: $B5HF#1QL@(
Date: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 19:37:21 EST


In article <20021007.115530.00078126.davem@redhat.com> (at Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:

> BTW, we start to run into conflicts now and most of USAGI patches now
> I need to apply some parts by hand. Here is one example, with this
> patch:
:
> It is not such a big deal now, but it may soon become larger as
> bigger USAGI patches are applied. We will need to synchronize
> at some point.

Agreed.

So,... What kind of patches do you prefer, now?

 - on top of plain kernel (2.4.19, 2.4.20, 2.4.21-preXX, or whatever)
 - plain kernel + on top of our whole patch?
 - ???

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:01:02 EST