Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@arcor.de)
Date: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 13:22:41 EST

Next message: Thomas Molina: "Re: Make 2.5.40-ac5 fails"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]"
In reply to: Jesse Pollard: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Next in thread: Rob Landley: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday 07 October 2002 15:56, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> [the mouse] will still stall everytime the mouse crosses the window border IF the
> application has specified "enter/leave" event notification. This requires the
> application to be swapped in to recieve the event. The only fix is locking
> the application/X libraries into memory.

That one could be punted with an hourglass cursor, until the events start flowing.
Well. Not sure how much this has to do with the kernel...

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Thomas Molina: "Re: Make 2.5.40-ac5 fails"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]"
In reply to: Jesse Pollard: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Next in thread: Rob Landley: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:59 EST