Re: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?

From: Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 12:48:09 EST

Next message: Stan Bubrouski: "Re: bcopy()"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.5.40-mm2"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andi,

Please send me a patch to remove TIOCGDEV from my tree.

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stan Bubrouski: "Re: bcopy()"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.5.40-mm2"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:59 EST