Re: New BK License Problem?

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 11:06:21 EST


On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Jan Harkes wrote:

> I'm expecting that all the BK->gnu patch gateways will be shut down in
> about 5 years,

I doubt that, the BK->patch "gateway" is a necessary part of
kernel development. Without it, bitkeeper would stop being
useful.

I could be wrong, but I'm under the impression that Larry
doesn't want others to just copy bitkeeper to come up with a
free tool almost as good as bitkeeper. There is no vendor
lock-in or anything else going on, afaics.

People who want to make something better than bitkeeper can
simply rsync the BK/SCCS repository from nl.linux.org and
use some SCCS clone to import the kernel data and commit
comments into their own repository ... they just can't use
bitkeeper to help them with their work.

regards,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:59 EST