Re: [PATCH] pcnet32 cable status check

From: Kent Yoder (key@austin.ibm.com)
Date: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 10:31:01 EST


Thus Spake Jeff Garzik:
>As Felipe mentioned, using the link interrupt instead of a timer is
>preferred -- but my own preference would be to apply your patch with the
>small remove-lp->mii-check fixup, and then investigate the support of
>link interrupts. The reasoning is that, pcnet32 covers a ton of chips,
>and not all may support a link interrupt.

  Jeff, I came across a PCNET FAST/79C971, which apparently also does not
give an interrupt when the cable is pulled. (My original tested card was a
PCnet/FAST III 79C975).

Kent

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:58 EST