Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)

From: Michael Hohnbaum (hohnbaum@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 20:25:45 EST


On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 17:36, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> > Just an order of magnitude figure for you ... number of seconds spent in kernel
> > space across all CPUs during a kernel compile on a 16-way NUMA-Q ...
> >
> > 2.4 with every patch I had (including O(1) sched + NUMA mods) ... 120s.
> > On 2.5.40-mm1 with one small NUMA scheduler patch ... 38s.
>
> Yeah, looking good..
>
Now if we could get the "one small NUMA scheduler patch" into the
kernel...

> Linus
>
>

-- 
Michael Hohnbaum            503-578-5486
hohnbaum@us.ibm.com         T/L 775-5486

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:49 EST