On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:10:34PM +0200, Martin Diehl wrote:
>
> Another question/suggestion: do we need to acquire port->sem in usbserial?
> Couldn't this be done with a spinlock - at least when called from_user?
It used to be a spinlock, but too many drivers did bad things with the
spinlock held, so I changed it to a semaphore so they could sleep while
it is held. I think in 2.5, all of the nasty drivers can be easily
fixed (the usb core now can be told not to sleep when submitting an
urb), so this might be able to be changed back to a spinlock.
> If we agree serial drivers shouldn't sleep in write_room()/write() my
> impression is this needs to be addressed somehow, regardless whether
> usbserial uses the new serial core or not. Anybody tried this with a
> bluetooth dongle over usbserial?
I don't know, do we agree that you can't sleep in those functions? If
so, I'll look into fixing the usbserial drivers up.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:37 EST