On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 October 2002 20:04, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 19:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > Again, m68k was the target.
> > >
> > > Sure fine, no good reason to be cryptic about it though.
> > >
> > > #error "m68k doesn't do SMP yet"
> > >
> > > So SMP must be off or the compile would abort. Well, the only interesting
> >
> > There's no CONFIG_SMP in the m68k arch config.in. Anyways, enough
> > beating of dead horse :)
>
> The horse isn't dead yet, it's still twitching a little. At this
> point we still need to speculate about wny anyone would want an SMP
> Dragonball machine ;-)
Dragonballs don't have an MMU, so they would run uClinux/m68k, not Linux/m68k.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.orgIn personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:34 EST