On Mon, Sep 30 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Due to recent "problems" (well the vm being just too damn good at keep
> > disks busy these days), it's become even more apparent that our current
> > io scheduler just cannot cope with some work loads. Repeated starvartion
> > of reads is the most important one. The Andrew Morton Interactive
> > Workload (AMIW) [1] rates the current kernel poorly, on my test machine
> > it completes in 1-2 minutes depending on your luck. 2.5.38-BK does a lot
> > better, but mainly because it's being extremely unfair. This deadline io
> > scheduler finishes the AMIW in anywhere from ~0.5 seconds to ~3-4
> > seconds, depending on the io load.
>
> would it be possible to make deadlines per-process to introduce ionice?
>
> ionice -n -5 mpg123 foo.mp3
> ionice make
Yes it would be possible, and at least for reads it doesn't require too
many changes to the deadline scheduler. There's even someone working on
it, expect something to play with soon. It bases the io priority on the
process nice levels.
-- Jens Axboe- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:32 EST