Re: [Hardeneddrivers-discuss] RE: [cgl_discussion] Some Initial Comments on DDH-Spec-0.5h.pdf

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 01:40:40 EST


Hi!

> > Most of what makes a 'good' driver is common for all purposes - things you
> > mention like don't make the system hang, don't cause fatal exceptions. But
> > there are some things that would be different between a desktop, embedded
> > system, enterprise server, or carrier server. For instance, when there is a
> > tradeoff between reliability and performance; when reliability is king, it
> > might be wise to do an insane amount of parameter checking to offset the
> > merest chance of an undetected bug crashing a system.
>
> This is not a valid example. We do not make tradeoffs between
> performance and reliability. Reliability _always_ comes first. If it
> did not, it's a bug.

No. We do run all drivers in *one* addressspace. That's bad for reliability.

-- 
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:29 EST