Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39
From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 00:24:18 EST
- Next message: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] Add gfp_mask to get_vm_area()"
- Next in thread: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Maybe reply: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Reply: george anzinger: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Maybe reply: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> I did some thinking, and I don't understand how this old code can be
> legal. Doesn't this make do_gettimeofday() inaccurate?
it's a mostly bogus comment, dont think about it too much.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] Add gfp_mask to get_vm_area()"
- Next in thread: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Maybe reply: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Reply: george anzinger: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Maybe reply: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:25 EST