Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39 with contest 0.41

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PROBLEM] 2.5.39 - might_sleep() exception - ACPI/APIC, UML compile issues on MP 2000+"
• Previous message: Steve Lion: "2.4.20-pre7-ac3+preempt Oops"
• In reply to: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39 with contest 0.41"
• Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39 with contest 0.41"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> ...
> Ok will fix. But please Andrew use version 0.41 of contest (posted only 2 hours
> ago). The results from that are far more meaningful and reproducible.
>

I am doing. I just tested for the "proces load" variation which
you saw (I assume that's what the test calls "CPU load"). With
and without the -mm patches:

cpuload 2:31.55 297%
cpuload 2:31.75 295%

So... Maybe some extra samples would be needed there.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PROBLEM] 2.5.39 - might_sleep() exception - ACPI/APIC, UML compile issues on MP 2000+"
• Previous message: Steve Lion: "2.4.20-pre7-ac3+preempt Oops"
• In reply to: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39 with contest 0.41"
• Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39 with contest 0.41"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:35 EST