node affine NUMA scheduler: simple benchmark

• Next message: Ricky Beam: "UP IO-APIC"
• Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Oops in 2.5.38-mm2"
• In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler"
• Next in thread: Erich Focht: "Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Here is a simple benchmark which is NUMA sensitive and simulates a simple
but normal situation in an environment running number crunching jobs. It
starts N independent tasks which access a large array in a random manner.
This is both bandwidth and latency sensitive. The output shows on which
node(s) the tasks have spent their lives. Additionally it shows (on a
NUMA scheduler kernel) the homenode (iSched).

Could you please run it on the virgin kernel and on the
"Both numasched patches, hack node IDs, alloc from current->node" one?

Maybe we see what's wrong...

Thanks,
Erich

• application/x-shellscript attachment: rand_updt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Ricky Beam: "UP IO-APIC"
• Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Oops in 2.5.38-mm2"
• In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler"
• Next in thread: Erich Focht: "Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:39 EST