Re: 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles

• Next message: bob: "Re: [ltt-dev] Re: [PATCH] LTT for 2.5.38 1/9: Core infrastructure"
• Previous message: Grega Fajdiga: "Oops in 2.5.38-mm2"
• In reply to: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:02:15AM +0000, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> sorry real 2.5.38-mm1 profile:
>> c01053dc 884615995 93.5551 poll_idle
>> c0114c28 38573436 4.07944 load_balance

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:40:55PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> Any idea why scheduler time shoot up with mm1 ? The RCU core
> patch (rcu_ltimer) in mm1 doesn't force any context switches, so it
> can't be that.

Basically, the time once spent in busywait becomes idle time.

Cheers,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: bob: "Re: [ltt-dev] Re: [PATCH] LTT for 2.5.38 1/9: Core infrastructure"
• Previous message: Grega Fajdiga: "Oops in 2.5.38-mm2"
• In reply to: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:38 EST