In article <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209192323530.1857-100000@imladris.surriel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Larry McVoy wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:01:33PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
>> > So, where did you put those 800 MB of kernel stacks needed for
>> > 100,000 threads ?
>>
>> Come on, you and I normally agree, but 100,000 threads? Where is the
>> need for that?
>
>I agree, it's pretty silly. But still, I was curious how they
>managed to achieve it ;)
You didn't read the post carefully.
They started and waited for 100,000 threads.
They did not have them all running at the same time. I think the
original post said something like "up to 50 at a time".
Basically, the benchmark was how _fast_ thread creation is, not now many
you can run at the same time. 100k threads at once is crazy, but you can
do it now on 64-bit architectures if you really want to.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST