Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK
From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Wed Sep 18 2002 - 12:36:00 EST
- Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Reply: Martin Mares: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > i agree that this is okay, as an added mechanism. Nevertheless this does
> > not eliminate the 'box locks up for seconds' (or even minutes) situation.
>
> The lockups I see range from hours to "it spun over the weekend, time to
> pull the plug".
this can happen if there's a genuine PID space squeeze wrt. nr_threads -
that is solved by adding Linus' suggestion to the PID allocator. I believe
you saw that problem, not any inherent get_pid() algorithmic inefficiency.
nevertheless we do lock up for 32 seconds if there are 32K PIDs allocated
in a row and last_pid hits that range - regardless of pid_max. (Depending
on the cache architecture it could take significantly more.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Reply: Martin Mares: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:23 EST