Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Fri Sep 06 2002 - 05:28:50 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: RE:Re: ide drive dying?"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: writing OOPS/panic info to nvram?"
In reply to: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> > I usually run byte bench regularly with every new kernel, so I see some
> > strange results here.
> >
> > From your numbers, I would say you are using a PIII 600/900 Mhz (more or
> > less). It is not an AMD AThlon or a PIV, since float and double are too
> > slow, not it is a K6 because they are too fast.
> Yes, I ran the test on a HP Omnibook 600 (PIII@900)

APM or ACPI? How did you guarantee not going powersave?
Pavel

-- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: RE:Re: ide drive dying?"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: writing OOPS/panic info to nvram?"
In reply to: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:30 EST