Re: BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1.0)

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Fri Sep 06 2002 - 06:57:46 EST

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Uptime timer-wrap"
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "[BK] ReiserFS PATCH resend (preallocation the default)"
In reply to: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1.0)"
Next in thread: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1.0)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 03:52:27PM +0800, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> I don't know what is happening,
> my apologies for these mangled emails.
> This should be the more intersting part of
> the test I've ran on the last -aa kernel.

Can you tell us what the 'baseline' is and what the 'result' is? Ie, which
kernels.

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk                              the dot in .tk
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Uptime timer-wrap"
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "[BK] ReiserFS PATCH resend (preallocation the default)"
In reply to: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1.0)"
Next in thread: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1.0)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST