Re: Little bug in O(1) scheduler patch (also in 2.4.19-ac4)

From: Juan M. de la Torre (jmtorre@gmx.net)
Date: Fri Sep 06 2002 - 05:19:29 EST

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [PATCH] IDE cleanup (1.612) broke all fdisks I have..."
Previous message: jamal: "Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Little bug in O(1) scheduler patch (also in 2.4.19-ac4)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I was wrong; the problem i was experimenting was due to a symbolic link
problem (i was compiling the module with other kernel headers). Since
the CRC of a versioned symbol is based on the function arguments i
thought that the different type of the argument (well, is the same type with
different name) has something to do with the error i was getting.

I apologize for wasting readers' time.

Regards,
Juanma

-- /jm

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [PATCH] IDE cleanup (1.612) broke all fdisks I have..."
Previous message: jamal: "Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Little bug in O(1) scheduler patch (also in 2.4.19-ac4)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST