Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Sep 05 2002 - 22:47:21 EST


   From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
   Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:59:47 -0400 (EDT)
   
   I would think shoving the data down the NIC
   and avoid the fragmentation shouldnt give you that much significant
   CPU savings.

It's the DMA bandwidth saved, most of the specweb runs on x86 hardware
is limited by the DMA throughput of the PCI host controller. In
particular some controllers are limited to smaller DMA bursts to
work around hardware bugs.

Ie. the headers that don't need to go across the bus are the critical
resource saved by TSO.

I think I've said this a million times, perhaps the next person who
tries to figure out where the gains come from can just reply with
a pointer to a URL of this email I'm typing right now :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST