Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> Hi,
> the e100 driver in 2.4.20pre5 fails to build due to a static procedure
> declaration with an unresolved symbol (see below), trivial patch to fix
> this is attached.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --- drivers/net/e100/e100_phy.c.orig 2002-09-05 00:35:38.000000000 +0200
> +++ drivers/net/e100/e100_phy.c 2002-09-05 01:03:32.000000000 +0200
> @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@
> * Returns: void
> *
> */
> -static void
> +void
> e100_force_speed_duplex(struct e100_private *bdp)
> {
> u16 control;
This is already sent to Marcelo for 2.4.x...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:23 EST