On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> > (allowing -10 might be too much of a stretch.)
>
> Why? If it's using more than 50% CPU, the prio will be the same as a
> zero-niced interactive process.
well, perhaps -10 could also be allowed.
does -10 make it equivalent to the 2.4 behavior? Could you somehow measure
the priority where it's still acceptable? Ie. -8 or -9?
> The minimum user nice value might be a good candidate for a new
> rlimit...
yes.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:18 EST