Re: Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19

From: Tobias Ringstrom (tori@ringstrom.mine.nu)
Date: Mon Sep 02 2002 - 08:42:00 EST


On 2 Sep 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> It isnt a regression, its a bug fix. The nice value is now being
> honoured properly.

The problem is that the kernel decided to nice the process (by changing
the priority, not the nice value) as if it was a background task, but it's
not a background task. On the contrary, it's highly interactive.

/Tobias

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:15 EST