Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection.

• Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection."
• Previous message: Nikita Danilov: "Re: [BK-PATCH-2.5] Introduce new VFS inode cache lookup function"
• In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection."
• Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday 02 September 2002 08:02, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 01:23, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> This week, it spread to SCTP.
> >> "struct list_head" isn't a great name, but having two names for
> >> everything is yet another bar to reading kernel source.
>
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:51:54AM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> > I am all for your cleanup here, but two nits:
> > Why not rename list_head while at it? I would vote for just "struct
> > list" ... the name is long, and I like my lines to fit 80 columns.
>
> Seconded. Throw the whole frog in the blender, please, not just half.

Thirded.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection."
• Previous message: Nikita Danilov: "Re: [BK-PATCH-2.5] Introduce new VFS inode cache lookup function"
• In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection."
• Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:15 EST