Re: Benchmarks for performance patches (-ck) for 2.4.19

From: Dieter Nützel (Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de)
Date: Sun Sep 01 2002 - 22:24:41 EST

Hello Con,

I have your ck5_2.4.19.patch with some additional stuff running fine on my
dual Athlon MP 1900+, MSI K7D Master-L, 1 GB DDR-SDRAM 266 CL.

ck5 + some 2.4.19-jam0 stuff (Andrea, Ingo, others)

000_e100-2.1.6 (-AA)
000_e1000-4.3.2 (-AA)
00_387-fix-1
10-module-size-checks
12-memparam
24-config-nr_cpus
30-smptimers-A0
30_irq-balance-12
31-nr_requests
70-i2c-2.6.4
71-sensors-2.6.4

2.4.19.pending ReiserFS stuff
linux-2.4.19-ntfs-2.1.0a.patch
page_color-2.4.19-pre10-1 (Page coloring)

I'm from Robert Love's "side" and have his stuff running on top of 2.4 for
nearly one year, now.

The first bench I try is latencytest-0.42-png all the time.
http://www.gardena.net/benno/linux/audio/

Then I try dbench (Yes, I know Rik ;-) to see the GREAT speed of Andrea
Arcangeli's -AA VM which improve noticeably with the Preemption patch.
O(1) gave some additional speed, too.

What about Robert's nice Preemption Latency Measurement Tool?
http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux

I tried it many times to gave Robert some feedback.

Regards and good work!

-Dieter 

-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel at hamburg.de (replace at with @)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:15 EST