On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:51:14AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:09:18PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Here's a patch to stop multiple simultaneous oopses on an SMP system from
> > interleaving with and overwriting bits of each other. It only permits lock
> > breaking if the printk lock is held by the same CPU.
>
> This is still wrong. It should attempt to acquire the locks with a timeout
> before trampling on them, as there may be a printk or other console output
> in progress on the other cpu.
/me must be having a bad week
The patch is actually right, but bust_spinlocks still blindly stops on locks
that may not need to be stomped on.
-ben
-- "You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST