Does Solaris really scale this well?

From: Dax Kelson (dax@gurulabs.com)
Date: Sat Aug 17 2002 - 12:53:16 EST

Next message: Adam Belay: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.31 driverfs: patch for your consideration"
Previous message: lists@corewars.org: "2.4.19 Oops' and crashes"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: IDE?"
Next in thread: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?"
Reply: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?"
Reply: venom@sns.it: "Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?"
Maybe reply: venom@sns.it: "Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From:

http://www.itworld.com/Man/3828/020816mcnealy/

Scott McNealy:

"When you take a 99-way UltraSPARC III machine and add a 100th processor,
you get 94 percent linear scalability. You can't get 94 percent linear
scalability on your first Intel chip. It's very, very hard to do, and they
have not done it."

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Adam Belay: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.31 driverfs: patch for your consideration"
Previous message: lists@corewars.org: "2.4.19 Oops' and crashes"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: IDE?"
Next in thread: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?"
Reply: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?"
Reply: venom@sns.it: "Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?"
Maybe reply: venom@sns.it: "Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:13 EST