Re: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)]

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Fri Aug 16 2002 - 09:21:33 EST


Dan Kegel wrote:
> You can actually consider posix AIO using sigtimedwait() to pick up
> completion notices to fit the definition of completion port if you
> squint a bit.

... with the bonus that it fits comfortably into a sigtimedwait() loop
that's waiting for non-AIO things too.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:12 EST