Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I thought that special case was removed long ago, because it is untenable
> in C++ etc (where such empty loops happen due to various abstraction
> issues, and not optimizing them away is just silly).
>
> But testing shows that you're right at least for 2.95 and 2.96. Argh
Unbelievably, 3.1 doesn't remove empty loops either.
I think there's a case for a compiler flag, `-fremove-empty-loops'.
Empty loop delays aren't portable acrosss compilers in general. If you
_really_ want an empty loop that must always work with GCC, it's easy
enough to write:
for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("");
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST