Hello!
This changeset fixes __FUNCTION__ usage as string literals to shut up
gcc 3.1+.
You can pull it from bk://thebsh.namesys.com/bk/reiser3-linux-2.4
Diffstat:
fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c | 4 ++--
fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 6 +++---
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Plain text patch:
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.682 -> 1.683
# fs/reiserfs/namei.c 1.20 -> 1.21
# include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h 1.18 -> 1.19
# fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c 1.13 -> 1.14
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 02/08/06 green@angband.namesys.com 1.683
# reiserfs_fs.h, namei.c, bitmap.c:
# fix __FUNCTION__ usage to prevent gcc 3.1+ warnings
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c b/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
--- a/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c Tue Aug 6 10:38:10 2002
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c Tue Aug 6 10:38:10 2002
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@
{
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
if (inode->u.reiserfs_i.i_prealloc_count < 0)
- reiserfs_warning("zam-4001:" __FUNCTION__ ": inode has negative prealloc blocks count.\n");
+ reiserfs_warning("zam-4001:%s: inode has negative prealloc blocks count.\n", __FUNCTION__);
#endif
if (inode->u.reiserfs_i.i_prealloc_count > 0) {
__discard_prealloc(th, inode);
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@
inode = list_entry(plist->next, struct inode, u.reiserfs_i.i_prealloc_list);
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
if (!inode->u.reiserfs_i.i_prealloc_count) {
- reiserfs_warning("zam-4001:" __FUNCTION__ ": inode is in prealloc list but has no preallocated blocks.\n");
+ reiserfs_warning("zam-4001:%s: inode is in prealloc list but has no preallocated blocks.\n", __FUNCTION__);
}
#endif
__discard_prealloc(th, inode);
diff -Nru a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
--- a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c Tue Aug 6 10:38:10 2002
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c Tue Aug 6 10:38:10 2002
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
while (1) {
retval = search_by_entry_key (dir->i_sb, &key_to_search, path_to_entry, de);
if (retval == IO_ERROR) {
- reiserfs_warning ("zam-7001: io error in " __FUNCTION__ "\n");
+ reiserfs_warning ("zam-7001: io error in %s\n", __FUNCTION__);
return IO_ERROR;
}
@@ -413,8 +413,8 @@
}
if (retval != NAME_FOUND) {
- reiserfs_warning ("zam-7002:" __FUNCTION__ ": \"reiserfs_find_entry\" has returned"
- " unexpected value (%d)\n", retval);
+ reiserfs_warning ("zam-7002:%s: \"reiserfs_find_entry\" has returned"
+ " unexpected value (%d)\n", __FUNCTION__, retval);
}
return -EEXIST;
diff -Nru a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
--- a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h Tue Aug 6 10:38:10 2002
+++ b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h Tue Aug 6 10:38:10 2002
@@ -75,9 +75,9 @@
/** always check a condition and panic if it's false. */
#define RASSERT( cond, format, args... ) \
if( !( cond ) ) \
- reiserfs_panic( 0, "reiserfs[%i]: assertion " #cond " failed at " \
- __FILE__ ":%i:" __FUNCTION__ ": " format "\n", \
- in_interrupt() ? -1 : current -> pid, __LINE__ , ##args )
+ reiserfs_panic( 0, "reiserfs[%i]: assertion " #cond " failed at " \
+ __FILE__ ":%i:%s: " format "\n", \
+ in_interrupt() ? -1 : current -> pid, __LINE__ , __FUNCTION__ , ##args )
#if defined( CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK )
#define RFALSE( cond, format, args... ) RASSERT( !( cond ), format, ##args )
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST