>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:29:09 -0500, "Van Maren, Kevin" <kevin.vanmaren@unisys.com> said:
Van> Yes, but that isn't the point: unless you eliminate all rw
Van> locks, it is conceptually possible to cause a kernel deadlock
Van> by forcing contention on the locks you didn't remove, if the
Van> user can force the kernel to acquire a reader lock and if
Van> something else needs to acquire the writer lock. Correctness
Van> is the issue, not performance.
I agree with Kevin here. There must be some argument as to why
readers cannot indefinitely lock out a writer. A probabilistic
argument is fine, but just saying "contention doesn't happen"
certainly isn't good enough.
--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:34 EST