Re: [PATCH] block/elevator updates + deadline i/o scheduler

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Sun Jul 28 2002 - 14:17:38 EST

Next message: Richard Gooch: "[PATCH] devfs v216 available"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [BK PATCH 2.5] fs/binfmt_aout.c: Use PAGE_ALIGN_LL() on 64-bit values"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] block/elevator updates + deadline i/o scheduler"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] block/elevator updates + deadline i/o scheduler"
Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] block/elevator updates + deadline i/o scheduler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:

| Cool. I'd be interested in latency and throughput results at this point,
| I have none of these. BTW, does anyone know of a good benchmark that
| also cares about latency?

Danger, use of 'good' and 'benchmark' together.
Nevertheless, tiobench (tiobench.sf.net) tries to care about &
measure latency.

-- ~Randy

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Gooch: "[PATCH] devfs v216 available"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [BK PATCH 2.5] fs/binfmt_aout.c: Use PAGE_ALIGN_LL() on 64-bit values"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] block/elevator updates + deadline i/o scheduler"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] block/elevator updates + deadline i/o scheduler"
Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] block/elevator updates + deadline i/o scheduler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:29 EST