On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 01:26:58 -0400 (EDT)
"Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu> wrote:
> >> The vast majority of us would need a microphone and
> >> translator program anyway, so a computer-friendly
> >> encoding makes more sense. Modems don't do morse.
> >
> > "asciimorse" would be possible, just going through the byte and
> > doing - for 1 and . for 0... as a matter of fact, it would probably
> > only take about two lines of code to get that to be an option, too.
> > Does everyone else think that that's really the situation?
> > (Personally, I can't do morse in my head. But neither do I have any
> > oops-decoding hardware. >:)
> >
> > I'll probably code it anyway. It should allow for a faster
> > transmission rate, anyway, since you don't have to accomodate
> > humans. (Anyone who can decode "asciimorse" in their head is a REAL
> > freak. Er. no offense.)
>
> Hopefully reasonable idea:
>
> Start each transmission with 900 HZ for 80 ms.
> Start each line with 1300 HZ for 40 ms.
> Each bit is 10 ms at 1600 HZ or 1900 HZ.
> Transmit the 7 low bits, plus a parity bit.
> End each line with a '\0' and a checksum byte.
> End each transmission with silence for 80 ms.
>
Reasonable -- it would still fit within the code framework I've got
right now, and within the way that panic_blink() works in general.
Do we use odd-parity, so that we can tell the \0 before the checksum
from a \0 in the input stream?
Does a crappy, battery-powered micro tape recorder have a chance of
recording this accurately?
> That ought to survive telephone transmission.
> If I'm lucky, it might survive MP3 encoding.
> It's about 120 WPM, and doesn't slow down on
> non-English text like an oops report.
Anyway, I like it in general. Could you write the decoder software, or
do we have any other volunteers on the list to do it? I'm not sure that
my /dev/dsp programming is up to snuff. (Actually, it'd probably be
easier operating on a .wav/.au unless you want real-time.)
Some final notes/questions:
* 10ms is just one jiffie on most arches in 2.4. That means that we
won't get perfect timing. (I don't think I want to switch to anything
_other_ than jiffies when we're panicked, but I don't know anything
about any of the higher-res stuff. Keep in mind that we get called
inside an infinite loop, and that it's not so easy to change that)
* Might anything from userland want access to this as a device? This
sounds nice at first blush, but using the same code to work well both
as a 'real' driver and for panic situation doesn't seem too easy.
--hobbs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:26 EST