Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.28

From: Jesse Barnes (jbarnes@sgi.com)
Date: Fri Jul 26 2002 - 12:40:39 EST


On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 07:11:28AM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> Well one one place? Every single implementation of the request_fn
> method from the request_queue_t needs to hold some
> lock associated with the queue in question.
>
> In fact you will find ASSERT_LOCK macros sparnkled through the scsi code
> already right now. BTW> ASSERT_HOLDS would sound a bit more
> familiar to some of us.
>
> This minor issue asside I think that your idea is a good thing.

Thanks for the pointer. I'll change those assertions over in the
next revision.

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:24 EST