Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 26 2002 - 05:39:51 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.19-rc3-ac3 ide_map_buffer/ide_unmap_buffer"
Previous message: Kiran: "Re: Patch 2.5.25: Ensure xtime_lock and timerlist_lock are on difft cachelines"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28"
Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> It occurs to me that this doesn't work too well without an MMU though. Got
> any better ideas? Could we disable entire processes when one of their pages
> is inaccessible?

It doesn't work with an MMU either. Consider O_DIRECT file writing from
such a page

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.19-rc3-ac3 ide_map_buffer/ide_unmap_buffer"
Previous message: Kiran: "Re: Patch 2.5.25: Ensure xtime_lock and timerlist_lock are on difft cachelines"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28"
Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:23 EST