On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 06:17:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Here's a small patch to get the i810_audio.c driver working again.
>
> Hmm..
>
> > @@ -2814,15 +2814,15 @@
> > }
> > dmabuf->count = dmabuf->dmasize;
> > outb(31,card->iobase+dmabuf->write_channel->port+OFF_LVI);
> > - save_flags(flags);
> > - cli();
> > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > + local_irq_disable();
>
> First off, "local_irq_save()" does both the save and the disable (the same
> way "spin_lock_irqsave()" does), it's the "local_save_flags(") that is
> equivalent to the old plain save_flags. So this should just be
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
> However, I also wonder if the code doesn't want any SMP locking? Is it ok
> to just make it a non-spinlock local interrupt disable, and if so, why?
Because this is all part of the module init code and our purpose here is
not locking out other users of the card (which is already accomplished via
the fact that card->initializing != 0 at the moment so any other attempts
to access the card, which must first go through the open routine to get a
file handle to the device, are all blocking in i810_open() or
i810_mixer_open() waiting on card->initializing to become 0) but instead
it is merely intended to stop all interrupts that might skew our timing
via udelay() on the local CPU (it's actually pretty important that we keep
our variance from a real 50ms delay as small as possible, since the more
variance we allow in this loop the more likely it will be that our sound
card will play sounds either a bit too fast or too slow).
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:18 EST