Robert Love wrote:
>
> ...
> I hope it compiles to nothing! There is a false in an if... oh, wait,
> to preserve possible side-effects gcc will keep the need_resched() call
> so I guess we should reorder it as:
>
> if (preempt_count() == 1 && need_resched())
>
> Then we get "if (0 && ..)" which should hopefully be evaluated away.
> Then the inline is empty and nothing need be done.
I think someone changed the definition of preempt_count()
while you weren't looking.
Plus it's used as an lvalue :(
-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:18 EST