On Wed, Jul 24 2002, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 21 2002, Adam Kropelin wrote:
> > > The cpqarray driver seems to have been broken around 2.5.19 with the
> > > blk_start_queue/blk_stop_queue changes. As-is, cpqarray deadlocks the entire
> > > system when it tries to do partition detection. The bits from the 2.5.19 patch
> > > which seem to relate are:
> > >
> > > > @@ -916,6 +915,7 @@
> > > > goto queue_next;
> > > >
> > > > startio:
> > > > + blk_stop_queue(q);
> > > > start_io(h);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1066,8 +1066,8 @@
> > > > /*
> > > > * See if we can queue up some more IO
> > > > */
> > > > - do_ida_request(BLK_DEFAULT_QUEUE(MAJOR_NR + h->ctlr));
> > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(IDA_LOCK(h->ctlr), flags);
> > > > + blk_start_queue(BLK_DEFAULT_QUEUE(MAJOR_NR + h->ctlr));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > >
> > > Simply reverting these changes allows the driver to successfully do
> > > partition detect, but it quickly hangs if any significant amount of
> > > I/O is attempted. The hang in this case seems to just affect processes
> > > trying to do I/O on the array; it is not a whole-system-deadlock.
> > >
> > > Test machine is SMP ppro.
> >
> > Thanks for the report. Could you just kill the spin_lock/unlock in
> > blk_stop_queue() in drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c and see if it works?
> >
> > --
> > Jens Axboe
>
> Jens, the same is in cciss.c.
> Please remove locking from blk_stop_queue() (as you suggested) or intrduce
> unlocking in request_functions.
I just fixed both of them in my BK and pushed it on. I opted for adding
a __blk_stop_queue() as well.
-- Jens Axboe- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:16 EST