On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 11:22, Scott Bronson wrote:
> 1) CONFIG_DRM_SIS needs to require CONFIG_FB_SIS_315.
> Currently, you can select CONFIG_DRM_SIS without CONFIG_FB_SIS_315.
> If you do that, you get undefined symbol errors for sis_malloc and
> sis_free.
>
> 2) CONFIG_FB_SIS must be compiled into the kernel (i.e. NOT a module).
> Currently, you can compile it as a module.
> If you do that, you ALSO get undefined symbol errors for
> sis_malloc and sis_free.
>
> These requirements could be enforced with CML rules. Before I
> submit the patch to do this, I'd like to know if that's the proper
> fix! Would it be better to just make CONFIG_FB_SIS able to be built
> as a module instead?
For the rules - go for it. For the modular driver ping the sisfb
maintainer first and check what is in the pipeline.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:15 EST