Re: [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruptionin2.5.27?]

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 03:17:38 EST


On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> > i've fixed this in my tree: the init thread needs to start up with a
> > nonzero preempt_count, and schedule_init() sets it to 0. [schedule_init()
> > is the point after we can schedule.]
>
> Sorry about the duplicated report, I must have missed the fix in the
> changelogs. [...]

sorry - i was too compact. What i wanted to say: "i agree that this is a
bug, and based on your report i've fixed this bug in my tree, it will show
up in the next patch". Thanks!

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:15 EST