Re: [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruption in2.5.27?]

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 02:37:20 EST


On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:

> [...] It'll be untrivial to fix all this, but this very subtle change to
> the locking semantics with CONFIG_PREEMPT is quite nasty.

well, preempt is different, lets face it. I'm very strongly against making
the irq-on path check for preemption ...

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:15 EST