Re: Patch for 256 disks in 2.4

From: Kurt Garloff (garloff@suse.de)
Date: Mon Jul 22 2002 - 16:12:52 EST

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.4.18 IDE channels block each other under load?"
Previous message: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Patch for 256 disks in 2.4"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: Patch for 256 disks in 2.4"
Next in thread: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Patch for 256 disks in 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:57:00PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I might be stupid, but it looks to me like we want both the new majors
> and the kernel structs dynamically allocated when they get actually used..

Sure. The sd dynamic major allocation uses the registered block majors first.

Regards,

-- Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> Eindhoven, NL GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, DE SCSI, Security

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.4.18 IDE channels block each other under load?"
Previous message: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Patch for 256 disks in 2.4"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: Patch for 256 disks in 2.4"
Next in thread: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Patch for 256 disks in 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:40 EST