Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Jul 21 2002 - 08:48:02 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] generalized spin_lock_bit"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] VM strict overcommit, again"
In reply to: Tom Walcott: "Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST"
Next in thread: Tom Walcott: "Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST"
Reply: Tom Walcott: "Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 05:42, Tom Walcott wrote:
> Can LVM2 currently do everything that EVMS does? From
> looking at this, it appears there is a difference.
> http://evms.sourceforge.net/comparison.pdf

Include an identical comparison document by the LVM2 team and it might
be worth looking at in detail 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] generalized spin_lock_bit"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] VM strict overcommit, again"
In reply to: Tom Walcott: "Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST"
Next in thread: Tom Walcott: "Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST"
Reply: Tom Walcott: "Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:35 EST