[PATCH] per-cpu patch 2/3

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 22:48:10 EST


Given the ongoing races with smp_processor_id() and preempt, this
makes sense to me. this_cpu() was too generic a name anyway.

Name: get_cpu_var patch
Author: Rusty Russell
Status: Cleanup

D: This makes introduces get_cpu_var() which gets a per-cpu variable
D: and disables preemption, and renames the (unsafe under preemption)
D: "this_cpu()" macro to __get_cpu_var(). It also deletes the
D: redundant definitions in linux/smp.h.

diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/include/linux/percpu.h working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/linux/percpu.h
--- linux-2.5.25/include/linux/percpu.h Mon Jun 24 00:53:24 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/linux/percpu.h Thu Jul 11 13:32:30 2002
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
 #else
 #define __per_cpu_data
 #define per_cpu(var, cpu) var
-#define this_cpu(var) var
+#define __get_cpu_var(var) var
 #endif
 
+#define get_cpu_var(var) ({ preempt_disable(); __get_cpu_var(var); })
+#define put_cpu_var(var) preempt_enable()
 #endif /* __LINUX_PERCPU_H */
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/include/linux/smp.h working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/linux/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.25/include/linux/smp.h Fri Jun 21 09:41:55 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/linux/smp.h Thu Jul 11 13:32:07 2002
@@ -89,10 +89,6 @@
 #define cpu_online_map 1
 #define cpu_online(cpu) 1
 #define num_online_cpus() 1
-#define __per_cpu_data
-#define per_cpu(var, cpu) var
-#define this_cpu(var) var
-
 #endif /* !SMP */
 
 #define get_cpu() ({ preempt_disable(); smp_processor_id(); })
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/include/asm-ia64/percpu.h working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/asm-ia64/percpu.h
--- linux-2.5.25/include/asm-ia64/percpu.h Tue Apr 23 11:39:38 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/asm-ia64/percpu.h Thu Jul 11 13:34:05 2002
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 extern unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];
 
 #define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*(__typeof__(&(var))) ((void *) &(var) + __per_cpu_offset[cpu]))
-#define this_cpu(var) (var)
+#define __get_cpu_var(var) (var)
 
 #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
 
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/include/asm-ia64/processor.h working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
--- linux-2.5.25/include/asm-ia64/processor.h Fri Jun 21 09:41:55 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/asm-ia64/processor.h Thu Jul 11 13:33:26 2002
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
  * The "local" data pointer. It points to the per-CPU data of the currently executing
  * CPU, much like "current" points to the per-task data of the currently executing task.
  */
-#define local_cpu_data (&this_cpu(cpu_info))
+#define local_cpu_data (&__get_cpu_var(cpu_info))
 #define cpu_data(cpu) (&per_cpu(cpu_info, cpu))
 
 extern void identify_cpu (struct cpuinfo_ia64 *);
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/include/asm-x86_64/percpu.h working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/asm-x86_64/percpu.h
--- linux-2.5.25/include/asm-x86_64/percpu.h Mon Jun 17 23:19:25 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/asm-x86_64/percpu.h Thu Jul 11 13:34:17 2002
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #include <asm/pda.h>
 
 /* var is in discarded region: offset to particular copy we want */
-#define this_cpu(var) (*RELOC_HIDE(&var, read_pda(cpudata_offset)))
+#define __get_cpu_var(var) (*RELOC_HIDE(&var, read_pda(cpudata_offset)))
 #define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*RELOC_HIDE(&var, per_cpu_pda[cpu]))
 
 void setup_per_cpu_areas(void);
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c working-2.5.25-getcpu/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c
--- linux-2.5.25/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c Thu Jun 20 01:28:47 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c Thu Jul 11 13:35:08 2002
@@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@
                 ia64_srlz_i();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- this_cpu(pfm_dcr_pp) = 0;
+ __get_cpu_var(pfm_dcr_pp) = 0;
 #else
                 pfm_tasklist_toggle_pp(0);
 #endif
@@ -2163,7 +2163,7 @@
         if (ctx->ctx_fl_system) {
                 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- this_cpu(pfm_dcr_pp) = 1;
+ __get_cpu_var(pfm_dcr_pp) = 1;
 #else
                 pfm_tasklist_toggle_pp(1);
 #endif
@@ -2218,8 +2218,8 @@
                 ia64_srlz_i();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- this_cpu(pfm_syst_wide) = 1;
- this_cpu(pfm_dcr_pp) = 0;
+ __get_cpu_var(pfm_syst_wide) = 1;
+ __get_cpu_var(pfm_dcr_pp) = 0;
 #endif
         } else {
                 /*
@@ -2973,9 +2973,9 @@
         p += sprintf(p, "CPU%d syst_wide : %d\n"
                         "CPU%d dcr_pp : %d\n",
                         smp_processor_id(),
- this_cpu(pfm_syst_wide),
+ __get_cpu_var(pfm_syst_wide),
                         smp_processor_id(),
- this_cpu(pfm_dcr_pp));
+ __get_cpu_var(pfm_dcr_pp));
 #endif
 
         LOCK_PFS();
@@ -3045,7 +3045,7 @@
         /*
          * propagate the value of the dcr_pp bit to the psr
          */
- ia64_psr(regs)->pp = mode ? this_cpu(pfm_dcr_pp) : 0;
+ ia64_psr(regs)->pp = mode ? __get_cpu_var(pfm_dcr_pp) : 0;
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -3539,8 +3539,8 @@
                 ia64_srlz_i();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- this_cpu(pfm_syst_wide) = 0;
- this_cpu(pfm_dcr_pp) = 0;
+ __get_cpu_var(pfm_syst_wide) = 0;
+ __get_cpu_var(pfm_dcr_pp) = 0;
 #else
                 pfm_tasklist_toggle_pp(0);
 #endif
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c working-2.5.25-getcpu/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c
--- linux-2.5.25/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c Thu May 30 10:00:47 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c Thu Jul 11 13:35:21 2002
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
                 pfm_save_regs(task);
 
 # ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (this_cpu(pfm_syst_wide))
+ if (__get_cpu_var(pfm_syst_wide))
                 pfm_syst_wide_update_task(task, 0);
 # endif
 #endif
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
                 pfm_load_regs(task);
 
 # ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (this_cpu(pfm_syst_wide)) pfm_syst_wide_update_task(task, 1);
+ if (__get_cpu_var(pfm_syst_wide)) pfm_syst_wide_update_task(task, 1);
 # endif
 #endif
 
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c working-2.5.25-getcpu/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c
--- linux-2.5.25/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c Thu Jun 20 01:28:47 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c Thu Jul 11 13:35:39 2002
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
 handle_IPI (int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
         int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- unsigned long *pending_ipis = &this_cpu(ipi_operation);
+ unsigned long *pending_ipis = &__get_cpu_var(ipi_operation);
         unsigned long ops;
 
         /* Count this now; we may make a call that never returns. */
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/include/asm-generic/percpu.h working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
--- linux-2.5.25/include/asm-generic/percpu.h Mon Apr 15 11:47:44 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/include/asm-generic/percpu.h Thu Jul 11 13:32:42 2002
@@ -8,6 +8,6 @@
 
 /* var is in discarded region: offset to particular copy we want */
 #define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*RELOC_HIDE(&var, __per_cpu_offset[cpu]))
-#define this_cpu(var) per_cpu(var, smp_processor_id())
+#define __get_cpu_var(var) per_cpu(var, smp_processor_id())
 
 #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_PERCPU_H_ */
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.25/kernel/softirq.c working-2.5.25-getcpu/kernel/softirq.c
--- linux-2.5.25/kernel/softirq.c Sun Jul 7 02:12:24 2002
+++ working-2.5.25-getcpu/kernel/softirq.c Thu Jul 11 13:31:26 2002
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@
         unsigned long flags;
 
         local_irq_save(flags);
- t->next = this_cpu(tasklet_vec).list;
- this_cpu(tasklet_vec).list = t;
+ t->next = __get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).list;
+ __get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).list = t;
         cpu_raise_softirq(smp_processor_id(), TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
         local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@
         unsigned long flags;
 
         local_irq_save(flags);
- t->next = this_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec).list;
- this_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec).list = t;
+ t->next = __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).list;
+ __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).list = t;
         cpu_raise_softirq(smp_processor_id(), HI_SOFTIRQ);
         local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
@@ -184,8 +184,8 @@
         struct tasklet_struct *list;
 
         local_irq_disable();
- list = this_cpu(tasklet_vec).list;
- this_cpu(tasklet_vec).list = NULL;
+ list = __get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).list;
+ __get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).list = NULL;
         local_irq_enable();
 
         while (list) {
@@ -205,8 +205,8 @@
                 }
 
                 local_irq_disable();
- t->next = this_cpu(tasklet_vec).list;
- this_cpu(tasklet_vec).list = t;
+ t->next = __get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).list;
+ __get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).list = t;
                 __cpu_raise_softirq(smp_processor_id(), TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
                 local_irq_enable();
         }
@@ -217,8 +217,8 @@
         struct tasklet_struct *list;
 
         local_irq_disable();
- list = this_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec).list;
- this_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec).list = NULL;
+ list = __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).list;
+ __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).list = NULL;
         local_irq_enable();
 
         while (list) {
@@ -238,8 +238,8 @@
                 }
 
                 local_irq_disable();
- t->next = this_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec).list;
- this_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec).list = t;
+ t->next = __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).list;
+ __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).list = t;
                 __cpu_raise_softirq(smp_processor_id(), HI_SOFTIRQ);
                 local_irq_enable();
         }

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST