Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Mon Jul 15 2002 - 13:50:58 EST


On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>
> It's not a different value in libproc. There's autodetection.
> I can't just support "the majority of ARM", and people keep
> giving me shit about HZ supposedly being a per-arch constant.
> (not that there's a sane way to get a per-arch constant from
> user code anyway)

But that's just _wrong_.

There _is_ a sane way to get the per-arch constant, and there has been for
a long long time.

The kernel exports it with the AT_CLKTCK ELF auxiliary note to every ELF
binary ever loaded, and I think glibc in turn exports that value through
the regular sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK) thing. (Yeah, I disagree with some of the
glibc sysconf implementation, but it sure should be there, and it's
documented).

If that doesn't work, then it's a glibc bug (well, in theory there could
be a kernel bug too, but since it's a one-liner in the kernel I really
doubt it).

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:31 EST