Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-rc1-ac3

• Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Process-wise swap-on/off option"
• Previous message: Chris Friesen: "Re: [patch[ Simple Topology API"
• In reply to: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-rc1-ac3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 17:43, Ed Tomlinson wrote:

> If you build with preempt=N (for the scheduler stuff) the link of the
> kernel fails.

What, someone does not use preemption? 8)

An updated patch is available:

        http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-rc1-ac3-2.patch

I missed the definition of the new spin_unlock_no_resched from 2.5 in
the !CONFIG_PREEMPT case. Thank you for pointing this out.

        Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Process-wise swap-on/off option"
• Previous message: Chris Friesen: "Re: [patch[ Simple Topology API"
• In reply to: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-rc1-ac3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:30 EST