Re: ext2 performance in 2.5.25 versus 2.4.19pre8aa2

From: Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Jul 15 2002 - 11:30:11 EST

Next message: Robert Love: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.24-D3, batch/idle priority scheduling, SCHED_BATCH"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
In reply to: Lincoln Dale: "ext2 performance in 2.5.25 versus 2.4.19pre8aa2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:22:56PM +1000, Lincoln Dale wrote:
> one-line summary is that some results are better, some are worse; CPU usage
> is better in 2.5.25, but thoughput is sometimes
> worse.

You might want to rerun your tests on 2.5.25 after redefining HZ to be 100,
or setting HZ to 1000 in the 2.4 kernel.

-ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Robert Love: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.24-D3, batch/idle priority scheduling, SCHED_BATCH"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
In reply to: Lincoln Dale: "ext2 performance in 2.5.25 versus 2.4.19pre8aa2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:30 EST