Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5

From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen (hps@intermeta.de)
Date: Mon Jul 15 2002 - 06:47:50 EST

Next message: Sam Vilain: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks"
Previous message: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [PATCH, 2.5] : Adding counters to BSD process accounting"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5"
Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5"
Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de> writes:

>implemented in Linux (any more), and will never ever be". If we explicitly
>exclude hardware, where do we end?!

Cleaner drivers, sane layers and an overall better working OS?

SCNR
Henning

-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de

Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sam Vilain: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks"
Previous message: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [PATCH, 2.5] : Adding counters to BSD process accounting"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5"
Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5"
Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:30 EST