Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............

From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net)
Date: Sat Jul 13 2002 - 08:43:49 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
In reply to: c0330: "Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Next in thread: Gerhard Mack: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Reply: Gerhard Mack: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Reply: Erik Andersen: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Will kernel tree 2.0 stop developing and regard historical after the
> release of 2.6? I think we would put our focus on much more newer kernel.
> And I found this may confuse the newbies, because they don't know much
> about versioning in Kernel.
>
> In nowsdays, there are less less compputers using 2.0. We should push
> them to upgrade, so I think stop developing 2.0 is better, in my opinion

Is there any reason at all to use 2.0 instead of 2.2?

-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester

Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
In reply to: c0330: "Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Next in thread: Gerhard Mack: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Reply: Gerhard Mack: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Reply: Erik Andersen: "Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST